Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42598571›Full record

Observational studySaudi medical journal2026

Establishment of a Specialized Pectus Clinic:

Zeead M AlGhamdi

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Saudi medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zeead M AlGhamdiThoracic surgery division, Department of surgery, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0096-4921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the establishment and early impact of a dedicated pectus clinic at a university hospital, focusing on patient characteristics, referral pathways, clinical presentation, and initial management strategies. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at a university hospital between January 2020 and April 2025, with 153 patients included in the final analysis. Data collected included demographic characteristics, referral sources, clinical presentation, deformity type, and treatment options. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: The mean patient age was 18.3 (range 1-44) years, with males accounting for 83.9% of cases. Pectus carinatum was the most common diagnosis (48.1%), followed by pectus excavatum (42.3%). Patient-initiated referrals, including those influenced by digital and social media platforms, represented 63.2% of referrals. Psychosocial concerns were the main presenting complaint in 60.6% of patients, whereas isolated functional symptoms were reported in 9%. Annual visits increased progressively throughout the study period. Non-operative treatment was commonly used for pectus carinatum, while surgical management was more frequent for pectus excavatum. Conclusions: A dedicated pectus clinic improved access to specialized care and supported structured management. The high proportion of patient-initiated referrals highlights the growing role of non-traditional referral pathways. The specialized clinic improved awareness, standardized the care, and addressed unmet needs in patients with pectus deformities.

Indexed as

Funnel ChestHospitals, UniversityReferral and ConsultationAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMalePectus CarinatumRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultChest wall deformityPectus carinatumPectus deformityPectus excavatumSpecialized clinic

Identifiers

PMID42598571
PMCPMC13471426

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.