ArticleBrain & spine2026
Abdominal aortic calcification as an opportunistic marker of reduced CT-derived vertebral bone density in osteoporotic vertebral fractures.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) frequently occur in patients without osteoporotic bone mineral density (BMD) on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), highlighting limitations of densitometry in capturing skeletal fragility. Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) reflects cumulative cardiometabolic burden and may serve as a marker of impaired bone quality. This study evaluated the association between AAC and CT-derived vertebral bone density in patients with OVFs. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 172 patients with OVFs (median age 79 years, 72.7% female) underwent DXA, CT-based Hounsfield Unit (HU) assessment, and lateral lumbar radiography. AAC was quantified using the Kauppila 24-point score. Associations between AAC and bone density parameters were assessed using correlation and multivariable linear regression adjusted for age and sex. Sensitivity analyses included severe AAC (≥16) and low bone quality (HU ≤ 90). Results: AAC was inversely associated with HU in unadjusted analyses (r = -0.19, p = 0.032), with a stepwise decline across AAC categories (p = 0.038). This association was attenuated after adjustment (β = -0.68, 95% CI -1.55 to 0.20, p = 0.127), while age remained independently associated with lower HU (p = 0.030). No association was observed between AAC and DXA T-scores. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated a consistent but non-significant inverse relationship. Conclusion: AAC demonstrates a consistent inverse relationship with CT-derived vertebral bone density in OVF patients; however, this association is largely driven by age. These findings support AAC as an opportunistic imaging marker of skeletal fragility in older adults rather than an independent determinant of bone density.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.