ArticleCritical care explorations2026
Early Mobilization and Rehabilitation Practices of Adult Patients Admitted to the ICU in Japan: A 1-Day Multicenter Point-Prevalence Study.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceEarly mobilization (EM) in the ICU mitigates post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) and improves functional outcomes. However, comprehensive national data on mobilization practices and patient-level barriers in Japan's super-aged society remain limited.
objectivesTo describe current mobilization and rehabilitation practices, the prevalence of EM, and factors associated with remaining in bed among adult ICU patients in Japan. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsThis nationwide, multicenter, cross-sectional, 1-day point-prevalence study was conducted on February 20, 2024, across ICUs in Japan. All adult patients (18 yr or older) physically present in the ICU between 00:00 and 14:00 were included. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The highest mobilization level was assessed using the ICU Mobility Scale (IMS). Out-of-bed mobilization was defined as IMS greater than or equal to 3, and EM as IMS greater than or equal to 3 within 48 hours of ICU admission. Patient characteristics, treatments, and perceived barriers were extracted from medical records. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors independently associated with remaining in bed.
resultsData were collected from 81 ICUs in 72 hospitals, and 693 patients were included in the analysis (median age, 72 yr; 68% 65 yr or older). Of these, 269 patients (38.8%) were receiving mechanical ventilation. Out-of-bed mobilization occurred in 42.6% of patients overall and in 17.8% of mechanically ventilated patients. EM within two days of ICU admission was achieved in 44.7% of patients overall and in 13.6% of mechanically ventilated patients. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that mechanical devices, particularly mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube, vasopressor use, sedative and analgesic administration, and coma were independently associated with a higher likelihood of remaining in bed. Conversely, the presence of delirium and higher nutritional intake were associated with a higher likelihood of achieving out-of-bed mobilization. Subjective assessments identified pathologic and psychoneurological factors as the predominant barriers. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Despite advanced patient age, mobilization and EM rates in Japanese ICUs were comparable to those reported internationally. However, patients at the highest risk for PICS, particularly those requiring advanced organ support or intensive sedation, were the least likely to achieve out-of-bed mobilization. These findings highlight a persistent clinical dilemma and suggest the need for tailored strategies to safely expand mobilization among the most vulnerable ICU populations in super-aged societies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.