ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026
Impact of routine use of the GFAP and UCH-L1 TBI blood test for management of mild TBI on patient care in a European emergency department.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBlood biomarkers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1) were recently introduced into clinical practice for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) assessment. However, real world data demonstrating TBI biomarkers' impact on the emergency department (ED) practice is lacking. This study aimed to describe the experience of a single tertiary hospital ED that introduced TBI biomarkers GFAP and UCH-L1 measurements using Alinity i
methodsRetrospective data were extracted from hospital records of patients who had TBI test ordered in the ED. Test results and subsequent clinical care pathway data (CT order, CT scan result, admission or discharge) were analysed.
resultsData was available for 460 mTBI patients (median age 43, 54% male). Of the 216 patients (47%) with a negative TBI test, 198 did not have a CT scan, and 18 had a CT scan with no abnormalities detected. Among 244 patients with a positive TBI test, 162 had CT scans, with 12 (6.6%) showing intracranial lesions. Overall, among all 180 scanned patients every patient with intracranial lesion findings had a positive TBI test result. The test could rule out CT scans in 47% of mild TBI patients. In practice, 42% of patients avoided a CT scan based on the TBI test results with additional 12% of patients ruled out based on clinical assessment.
conclusionsRoutine TBI test use spared over 40% of patients from CT scanning, with further potential to reduce unnecessary imaging through improved protocol adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.