Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42599528›Full record

ArticleResearch on child and adolescent psychopathology2026

Examining Pubertal and Cognitive Differences in Adolescent Depressive Symptoms Using Drift Diffusion Modeling.

Kelly R Barry, Natasha Chaku, Lindsay Till Hoyt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research on child and adolescent psychopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kelly R BarryDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Heyne Building #126, Houston, TX, 77204, USA.
Natasha ChakuDepartment of Psychology, Fordham University, 226 Dealy Hall, New York City, NY, 10458, USA. nchaku@iu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0944-6159
Lindsay Till HoytDepartment of Psychology, Fordham University, 226 Dealy Hall, New York City, NY, 10458, USA.

Funding

Fordham University Faculty Research GrantSociety for Research in Child Development Dissertation Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk for depression increases during adolescence, reflecting a constellation of cascading interactions between affective, biological, and cognitive factors. Drift diffusion modeling (DDM) can clarify the cognitive mechanisms underlying risk for depression by decomposing cognitive task performance into latent components, such as drift rate, boundary separation, and non-decision time. However, limited research has applied DDM to adolescent depression or examined whether these cognitive processes interact with pubertal timing, a key biological risk factor. Participants were 103 racially/ethnically and socioeconomically diverse youth (M

Indexed as

CognitionDepressionExecutive FunctionPubertyAdolescentChildDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleModels, PsychologicalAdolescenceDepressionDrift Diffusion ModelingEmotion regulationExecutive functioningPuberty

Identifiers

PMID42599528
PMCPMC13476296

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.