Evidence mapPaperPMID 42599573Full record

ReviewCurrent medical science2026

Nose-to-Brain Nanocarriers for Migraine Management: A Comprehensive Review of Drug Delivery Strategies and Translational Challenges.

Hala Bashtawi, Mohammad A Obeid

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hala BashtawiDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Yarmouk University, Irbid, 21163, Jordan.
Mohammad A ObeidDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Yarmouk University, Irbid, 21163, Jordan. m.obeid@yu.edu.jo.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migraine is among the most prevalent neurological disorders and can affect people's daily activities because of high- and long-lasting pain intensity attacks. The available dosage forms, such as oral and parenteral formulations, can enhance patients' symptoms but still have poor side effects, bioavailability, or dosing difficulty. As a result, there is an urgent need to find other novel drug delivery systems (DDSs) to treat migraine. The intranasal (IN) route was investigated as an alternative pathway to deliver therapeutic molecules directly to the brain, bypassing the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and hepatic first-pass metabolism. Nanocarriers facilitate drug transportation regardless of their lipophilicity, resulting in more efficient drug absorption and bioavailability. They also effectively contribute to brain targeting, which maximizes the therapeutic effect of drugs. This review discusses the efficacy of nanocarriers loaded with antimigraine agents and delivered by the IN route in the management of migraine. In preclinical studies, nanocarriers such as liposomes, ethosomes, nanostructured lipid carriers, and many others have been used to enhance brain targeting. Studies have focused on obtaining high results for brain pharmacokinetics, such as drug targeting efficiency (DTE) and direct transport percentage (DTP). This leads to better drug accumulation and a rapid onset of action. Despite the proven success of preclinical studies on the delivery of migraine drugs loaded with nanocarriers through the IN route, there is still a shortage in translating this success into the clinical stage.

Indexed as

Brain targetingDrug delivery systemsIntranasal administrationLipid nanocarriersMigraineNose-to-brain deliveryPreclinical pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.