Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42599589›Full record

ArticleOdontology2026

Effect of polymerization mode and LED light-curing units on the shear bond strength of an alkasite restorative material to dentin.

Melek Taş Çinkılıç, Fikret Yılmaz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Melek Taş ÇinkılıçFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Kurupelit, 55139, Samsun, Turkey. melek.tas@omu.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1894-0041
Fikret YılmazFaculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Kurupelit, 55139, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9621-4788

Funding

Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi BAP04-B-2024-4676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This in vitro study evaluated the effects of different polymerization approaches and LED light-curing units on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a bioactive alkasite restorative material to dentin and compared the results with those of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC). Fifty extracted human premolars were randomly assigned to five groups according to the polymerization protocol. The alkasite material was polymerized either by self-curing or with two different LED light-curing units (VALO Cordless and Bluephase), while the RMGIC was light-cured using the same devices. All specimens were subjected to 5,000 thermal cycles between 5 °C and 55 °C before SBS testing using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were evaluated using stereomicroscopy, and representative specimens were examined by scanning electron microscopy. The mean SBS values were 15.77 ± 5.66 MPa, 15.51 ± 3.16 MPa, and 16.11 ± 4.37 MPa for the self-cured, VALO-cured, and Bluephase-cured alkasite groups, respectively, whereas the corresponding values for the RMGIC groups were 8.97 ± 2.80 MPa and 8.20 ± 2.51 MPa. No significant differences were observed among the alkasite groups or between the RMGIC groups (p > 0.05). However, all alkasite groups demonstrated significantly higher SBS values than the RMGIC groups (p ≤ 0.004). The findings of the present study demonstrate that the bioactive alkasite restorative material provides higher dentin bond strength than the RMGIC, regardless of the polymerization mode or LED light-curing unit used. Furthermore, neither self-curing nor light-curing with different LED devices significantly affected its shear bond strength.

Indexed as

AlkasiteLED light-curing unitsPolymerizationShear bond strength

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.