Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42599661›Full record

ArticleSpine deformity2026

Use of pre-operative SRS-22r profiles to predict clinically meaningful improvement after AIS surgery: a detailed multivariable MCID analysis in 189 patients.

Matthew J Geck, Devender Singh, Kartik S Akkihal, Aiyana Adams, John K Stokes, Eeric Truumees

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew J GeckAscension Texas Spine and Scoliosis, Austin, TX, USA.
Devender SinghAscension Texas Spine and Scoliosis, Austin, TX, USA.
Kartik S AkkihalTexas A&M College of Medicine at Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Aiyana AdamsTexas A&M College of Medicine at Round Rock, Round Rock, TX, USA.
John K StokesAscension Texas Spine and Scoliosis, Austin, TX, USA.
Eeric TruumeesAscension Texas Spine and Scoliosis, Austin, TX, USA. Etruumees@ascension.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective study.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the predictive ability of pre-operative Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised questionnaire (SRS-22r) domains for achieving Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) at 2 years after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery. Understanding which AIS will achieve clinically meaningful postoperative benefit remains challenging, particularly when counseling families about expected changes in health-related quality of life. MCID thresholds for SRS-22r domains have been described, but it is unclear how baseline profiles can be leveraged to anticipate meaningful improvement at 2 years after surgery.

methodsA retrospective analysis of AIS patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion was performed. Pre-operative, 1-year, and 2-year SRS-22r domain scores (Function, Pain, Self-Image, Mental Health), VAS pain, and ODI were collected. MCID was defined as a ≥ 1-point improvement from baseline to 2 years. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed, and model performance was assessed using ROC-AUC and calibration curves. ROC-based threshold optimization using Youden's J statistic, and fivefold cross-validation was used to derive clinically interpretable pre-operative cut-points.

resultsIn total, 189 patients were analyzed for the study. All SRS-22r domains improved significantly at 2 years, with the greatest absolute gain in Self-Image 64.9% achieved MCID, followed by Pain 46.5%, Function 37.7%, and Mental Health 36.0%. Lower pre-operative domain scores strongly predicted MCID (OR range 0.03-0.13) and pronounced ceiling effects were observed among patients with high baseline scores. Multivariable models demonstrated excellent to outstanding discrimination via AUC: Function (0.95), Mental Health (0.91), Pain (0.87), and Self-Image (0.83), with good calibration across risk strata. ROC-based optimal pre-operative thresholds were Function ≤ 3.2, Pain ≤ 3.4, Self-Image ≤ 3.2, and Mental Health ≤ 3.8, and showed stable performance on cross-validation.

conclusionPre-operative SRS-22r domain scores are robust predictors of clinically meaningful improvement following AIS surgery. Self-Image demonstrates the greatest postoperative responsiveness, and lower baseline PROM severity consistently confers higher likelihood of achieving MCID, whereas patients starting with near-ceiling scores show limited numerical gain. The combination of domain-specific logistic regression models, ROC-derived cut-points, and well-calibrated probability estimates supports the development of practical PROM-based prediction tools to enhance pre-operative counseling, expectation management, and shared decision-making in AIS care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)Minimum clinically important difference (MCID)Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs)ROC curveSRS-22rYouden’s J statistic

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.