ReviewCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2026
Decoding Immune Cell Doublets in Humans: From Artifacts to Insights.
Review in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A high-resolution blood immune cell doublet atlas via imaging spectral cytometry.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although routinely detected in human blood and tissue samples, immune cell doublets are typically discarded during data acquisition or analysis, often dismissed as technical artifacts arising from ex vivo cell handling. However, emerging evidence suggests that these immune cell doublets reflect biologically meaningful interactions, offering critical insights into immune communication during health and disease. In this review, we evaluate the current evidence supporting the existence of biological immune cell doublets across various human tissues, highlighting their diverse phenotypes and functions that distinguish them from technical noise. We explore how existing single-cell datasets and analytical frameworks can be repurposed to study doublets, and we examine the primary challenge in the field, which is the lack of definitive markers to distinguish biological doublets from artifacts. Finally, we examine how novel technologies, namely high-throughput image-enabled sorting, are facilitating the next generation of research on this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.