ArticleNature cardiovascular research2026
Accounting for uncertainty in computational models of ventricular tachycardia improves ablation guidance.
Article in Nature cardiovascular research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Personalized 'digital twin' technology has the potential to revolutionize target guidance for catheter ablation therapy of ventricular tachycardia (VT); however, concerns regarding the practical implementation of these computationally intensive approaches, along with the robustness of simulation predictions given uncertainty in the interpretation and analysis of clinical imaging data used to reconstruct image-based models, are hindering clinical translation. Here we present a new technical framework that provides near-real-time guidance on VT ablation targets, inherently incorporating uncertainty in reconstructed scar anatomy. We demonstrate close agreement between simulated ECG 'fingerprint' signatures of VT circuits and clinical recordings in ischemic ablation patients, highlighting the need to account for variations in reconstructed scar anatomy to identify the best-matching simulated circuit. Finally, we introduce a robust method for integrating anatomical information across all viable simulated circuits from different model 'instances' into a simulated ablation target heatmap for practical clinical guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.