Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42601469›Full record

ArticleNature cardiovascular research2026

Accounting for uncertainty in computational models of ventricular tachycardia improves ablation guidance.

Abdul Mateen Qadri, Ursula Rohrer, Fernando O Campos, Iulia Nazarov, Ali-Razak Rashid, Pranav Bhagirath, C Aldo Rinaldi, Ronak Rajani, Luca Azzolin, Aurel Neic and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cardiovascular research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Abdul Mateen Qadri *Research Department of Digital Twins in Healthcare, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Ursula Rohrer *Research Department of Digital Twins in Healthcare, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5278-6362
Fernando O CamposResearch Department of Digital Twins in Healthcare, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Iulia NazarovResearch Department of Digital Twins in Healthcare, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Ali-Razak RashidResearch Department of Digital Twins in Healthcare, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0295-7978
Pranav BhagirathDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C Aldo RinaldiResearch Department of Digital Twins in Healthcare, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Ronak RajaniResearch Department of Digital Twins in Healthcare, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Luca AzzolinNumeriCor, Graz, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2919-4617
Aurel NeicNumeriCor, Graz, Austria.
Gernot PlankDivision of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7380-6908
John WhitakerResearch Department of Digital Twins in Healthcare, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Martin J BishopResearch Department of Digital Twins in Healthcare, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. martin.bishop@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6237-1902

Funding

British Heart Foundation (BHF) RG/F/25/110163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personalized 'digital twin' technology has the potential to revolutionize target guidance for catheter ablation therapy of ventricular tachycardia (VT); however, concerns regarding the practical implementation of these computationally intensive approaches, along with the robustness of simulation predictions given uncertainty in the interpretation and analysis of clinical imaging data used to reconstruct image-based models, are hindering clinical translation. Here we present a new technical framework that provides near-real-time guidance on VT ablation targets, inherently incorporating uncertainty in reconstructed scar anatomy. We demonstrate close agreement between simulated ECG 'fingerprint' signatures of VT circuits and clinical recordings in ischemic ablation patients, highlighting the need to account for variations in reconstructed scar anatomy to identify the best-matching simulated circuit. Finally, we introduce a robust method for integrating anatomical information across all viable simulated circuits from different model 'instances' into a simulated ablation target heatmap for practical clinical guidance.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationComputer SimulationModels, CardiovascularTachycardia, VentricularAction PotentialsElectrocardiographyHumansUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID42601469
PMCPMC13561879

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.