SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2026
Incidence of neonatal sepsis among HIV exposed neonates of mothers on integrase strand transfer inhibitors in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-exposed infants face elevated risks of neonatal sepsis, influenced by maternal antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens. Dolutegravir (DTG), a widely used integrase transfer inhibitor (INSTI), and the preferred first line drugs for management of HIV in pregnancy, has shown potential adverse effects such as hyperglycaemia, which may impact neonatal outcomes including risk of neonatal sepsis. We estimated the pooled incidence of neonatal sepsis among neonates exposed to INSTIs in utero compared to non-INSTIs-based ART regimens. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following written as per the PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Global Health and Global Index Medicus were searched for studies published between January 2013 and September 2025. Eligible studies included clinical trials and cohort studies comparing INSTI-based ART regimens with non-INSTI regimens among pregnant women living with HIV. Data were extracted using Covidence software, Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to assessed for quality of randomised clinical trials and observational studies, respectively. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading, Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.
resultsA total of 714 studies were identified and screened based on their titles and abstracts, of which 63 articles underwent full-text review. Ultimately, four studies, comprising 7,636 participants, met the predefined eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for neonatal sepsis among infants exposed to INSTIs was 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15-1.30, p = 0.137). The test for subgroup difference was not significant (p = 0.358): the pooled OR for dolutegravir was 0.27 (95% CI 0.06-1.23, p = 0.090) and for the single raltegravir study was 0.73 (95% CI 0.16-3.30, p = 0.681).
conclusionINSTI-based ART was not associated with a significant difference in neonatal sepsis risk compared with non-INSTI regimens. However, the low number of events limited the precision of the estimates, highlighting the need for further research. REGISTRATION: This review has been registered with the PROSPERO at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251178411 , registration number CRD420251178411.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.