ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Effect of Die Ditching on the Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM-Fabricated Co-Cr Crowns: An In Vitro Comparative Study.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Manual die ditching may compromise CAD/CAM crown marginal accuracy beyond clinical thresholds. This in vitro study evaluated how conventional die ditching versus non‑ditching of removable stone dies influences the marginal fit of digitally fabricated cobalt‑chromium crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS A mandibular first molar typodont prepared for a complete crown was duplicated into 20 stone dies, randomized into non-ditched (Gp CN) or ditched (Gp CD) groups (n=10 each), with the typodont as a reference (Gp T). Gp CD underwent standardized ditching; Gp CN received minimal trimming. Following scanning, digital design, and milling, marginal fit was assessed via 3D STL superimposition at eight landmarks. Landmark-specific Root Mean Square (RMS) deviations were averaged for mean marginal RMS (primary outcome), while landmark-level values served as exploratory data. Non‑parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's post‑hoc, Mann-Whitney U, Friedman) were used as primary analyses, with Welch t‑tests and Cohen's d calculated only as sensitivity measures (alpha=0.05). RESULTS In terms of the primary outcome, crowns on non‑ditched dies showed lower mean marginal discrepancies (0.086±0.070 mm) than those on ditched dies (0.147±0.200 mm). A secondary outcome analysis using 3D STL superimposition showed that Gp CD had higher Root Mean Square (RMS) deviations, suggesting that ditching reduces the stability of the finish‑line registration during scanning. Gp CN values stayed well within the 120 µm clinical acceptability threshold, but Gp CD values were observed to cross this threshold. CONCLUSIONS Within this CAD/CAM workflow, conventional die ditching was associated with larger marginal discrepancies and fewer measurements within the 120‑µm clinical threshold, with localized effects most evident buccally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.