ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Machine learning and individual variability in electrical field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response for anxiety in older adults in the ACT trial.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02851511 (Augmenting Cognitive Training In Older Adults), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Augmenting Cognitive Training In Older Adults
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Anxiety is highly prevalent in older adults and often co-occurs with neurodegenerative disorders, worsening cognitive decline and quality of life. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown therapeutic potential, but outcomes remain inconsistent due to individual neurophysiological variability. Method: We trained machine learning (ML) models to predict state anxiety reduction following active tDCS paired with BrainHQ cognitive training (tDCS + CT) in older adults with moderate/severe baseline state anxiety symptoms from the Augmenting Cognitive Training in Older Adults (the ACT trial, NCT02851511). Our models predicted outcomes based on MRI-derived current density maps (J-maps) generated via finite element modeling. We evaluated the model using (1) repeated mixed-site nested cross-validation and (2) repeated cross-site held-out-site validation; in both settings, analyses were conducted on the 20 eligible participants. Results: The model achieved a mean balanced accuracy of 82% in the repeated mixed-site nested cross-validation and 72% in the repeated cross-site held-out validation. SHAP-based interpretation of our ML models identified the current density in posterior fusiform cortex and inferior temporal gyrus (posterior and temporooccipital divisions) as the most influential predictors of intervention response. Discussion: Posterior ventral temporal cortices emerged as critical substrates for predicting intervention response, consistent with prior studies linking fusiform and amygdala-temporal dynamics to anxiety severity and fearful face processing. These findings highlight how perceptual processes, particularly those mediated by the fusiform gyrus, shapes intervention response. Altogether, this work paved the way for ML-guided precision modeling to personalize non-invasive transcranial electrical interventions for anxiety in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.