ArticleJournal of pain research2026
On the Concept of Pain Chronicization: Clinical Observations and Neurobiological Inference.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pain chronicization is commonly used to describe the transition from acute to chronic pain driven by central mechanisms. Objective: To reassess its clinical relevance by comparing neurobiological models with patient observation. Methods: Conceptual analysis integrating experimental data and clinical experience. The analysis particularly considers animal models, human neuroimaging and ICD‑11 chronic pain categories. Results: While central sensitization is well established experimentally, clinical observation rarely shows a clear transition from acute to chronic pain. Chronic pain is typically heterogeneous, discontinuous and influenced by multiple factors. Neuroimaging findings are largely associative and lack temporal and causal definition. The distinction between chronic primary and secondary pain is clinically useful but does not demonstrate a biological conversion. Conclusion: Pain chronicization should be considered a theoretical construct rather than a clinically demonstrable process, and interpreted with caution in individual patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.