Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42602898›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2026

On the Concept of Pain Chronicization: Clinical Observations and Neurobiological Inference.

Cesare Bonezzi, Diego Fornasari, Andrea Tinnirello, Michael E Schatman, Laura Demartini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cesare BonezziPain Medicine Unit, Department of Mini-Invasive Surgery, IRCCS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.
Diego FornasariDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Andrea TinnirelloAnesthesia and Pain Management Unit, Iseo Hospital, ASST Franciacorta, Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2217-7942
Michael E SchatmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, & Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1019-0413
Laura DemartiniPain Medicine Unit, Department of Mini-Invasive Surgery, IRCCS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pain chronicization is commonly used to describe the transition from acute to chronic pain driven by central mechanisms. Objective: To reassess its clinical relevance by comparing neurobiological models with patient observation. Methods: Conceptual analysis integrating experimental data and clinical experience. The analysis particularly considers animal models, human neuroimaging and ICD‑11 chronic pain categories. Results: While central sensitization is well established experimentally, clinical observation rarely shows a clear transition from acute to chronic pain. Chronic pain is typically heterogeneous, discontinuous and influenced by multiple factors. Neuroimaging findings are largely associative and lack temporal and causal definition. The distinction between chronic primary and secondary pain is clinically useful but does not demonstrate a biological conversion. Conclusion: Pain chronicization should be considered a theoretical construct rather than a clinically demonstrable process, and interpreted with caution in individual patients.

Indexed as

central sensitizationchronic painclinical observationnociplastic painpain mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID42602898
PMCPMC13475415

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.