Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42603395›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Integrated Analysis of SNPs and Structural Variations via High-depth Whole-genome Sequencing Reveals the Genetic Architecture and Optimizes Genomic Prediction in Chickens.

Haoqiang Ye, Siyu Zhang, Lin Qi, Xiaoqi Liu, Semiu Folaniyi Bello, Changbin Zhao, Wen Luo, Qinghua Nie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haoqiang YeDepartment of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Siyu ZhangFujian Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350013, China.
Lin QiDepartment of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Xiaoqi LiuDepartment of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Semiu Folaniyi BelloAgriculture Research Group, Organization of African Academic Doctors (OAAD), Off Kamiti Road, P. O. Box 25305-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Changbin ZhaoDepartment of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Wen LuoDepartment of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China. Electronic address: luowen729@scau.edu.cn.
Qinghua NieDepartment of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding and Key Lab of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affair, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China. Electronic address: nqinghua@scau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The characterization of genetic architecture and the optimization of genomic prediction are pivotal for the genetic improvement of complex traits in poultry. In this study, we investigated the genetic basis of 15 growth and carcass traits in an F2 chicken population (n = 877) using high-depth whole-genome sequencing with an average coverage of 31.2 × . By implementing an ensemble strategy involving four independent callers, we identified 35,924 high-confidence structural variations (SVs), with deletions being the most prevalent type. Combining SNPs and SVs enhanced genomic heritability for 14 out of 15 traits compared to SNPs alone. SNP-based GWAS corroborated well-known genes, including the prominent QTL cluster on chromosome 1, the NCAPG-LCORL locus on chromosome 4, and IGF2BP1 on chromosome 27. Notably, SV-based analysis unveiled additional candidate genes, such as ZNF385D, MYH10, and MOB1B. To gain functional insights, eQTL-GWAS colocalization analysis integrating SNP-based GWAS signals with tissue-specific eQTL data identified significant colocalization signals for ITM2B in brain tissue, potentially implicating excitatory synaptic transmission, and TRIM13 in blood, potentially implicating inflammatory and immune regulation. To optimize genomic breeding value estimation through the effective utilization of multi-type markers, we developed GPDLBP, a hybrid deep learning framework that integrates locally connected networks to capture SV effects with the GBLUP model for SNP effects. Compared with the traditional SNP-only model, GPDLBP improved prediction accuracy for most traits, with gains exceeding 2% for BW21 (body weight at 21 days of age), BW49 (body weight at 49 days of age), EW (eviscerated weight), LMW (leg muscle weight), and AFW (abdominal fat weight); for example, prediction accuracy increased from 0.512 to 0.532 for BW49 and from 0.471 to 0.491 for EW. These findings show that SVs complement SNPs in both genetic dissection and genomic prediction of economically important traits in chickens. The integration of multiple variant types provides a practical strategy for accelerating precision breeding in high-depth sequencing-based poultry programs.

Indexed as

ChickenDeep learningGenome‐wide association analysisGenomic predictionStructural variation

Identifiers

PMID42603395
PMCPMC13499392

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.