Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42603949›Full record

ReviewGastro hep advances2026

Cell Therapy in Advanced Cirrhosis: From Preclinical Evidence to Clinical Application.

Kayleigh L Thirlwell, Monica Reis, Jessica Llewellyn, Clifford A Brass, Lara Campana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gastro hep advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kayleigh L ThirlwellResearch and Translational Science Department, Resolution Therapeutics Ltd, Edinburgh, UK.
Monica ReisResearch and Translational Science Department, Resolution Therapeutics Ltd, Edinburgh, UK.
Jessica LlewellynResearch and Translational Science Department, Resolution Therapeutics Ltd, Edinburgh, UK.
Clifford A BrassClinical Development Department, Resolution Therapeutics Ltd, Edinburgh, UK.
Lara CampanaResearch and Translational Science Department, Resolution Therapeutics Ltd, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

End-stage liver disease (ESLD) presents a significant worldwide health and economic burden accounting for 4% of global deaths. When ESLD develops into liver failure, the only effective treatment is liver transplantation, which is limited by surgical and access barriers and significant posttransplant complications. Furthermore, the scarcity of suitable donors means many patients deteriorate or die while waiting for a transplant, highlighting the need for alternative therapeutic strategies. ESLD is characterized by a multifactorial pathophysiology driven by a complex interplay of extensive parenchymal damage, self-perpetuating chronic inflammation, and advanced fibrosis. Cell-based therapies have emerged as promising alternatives to restore liver function through either parenchymal replacement or microenvironment remodeling. While primary hepatocyte transplantation remains the benchmark for parenchymal replacement, emerging modalities have undergone substantial evolution, demonstrating an enhancement in the integration of the transplanted cells into the diseased liver tissue to ameliorate liver function. Despite these advances, suboptimal engraftment due to the negative effect of the liver dysfunctional microenvironment results in limited durability and functional impact of parenchymal replacement. As the negative role of the dysfunctional microenvironment in disease progression became clearer, the focus for disease-modifying cell therapy shifted toward microenvironment-remodeling therapies. Mesenchymal stromal cells, regulatory T cells, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, and regenerative macrophages have been recognized as powerful modalities, with the potential to offer durable restoration of liver function by exerting anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects, thereby favoring endogenous repair. In this review, we discuss these evolving platforms, delineate their mechanistic underpinnings, and define the opportunities and challenges that shape their translation into clinically viable alternatives for treating ESLD.

Indexed as

Cell TherapyCirrhosisFibrosisHepatic DecompensationInflammation

Identifiers

PMID42603949
PMCPMC13476498

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.