ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2026
Prospects for Complete DNA Barcode Coverage of the New Zealand Insect Fauna.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate identification of insects supports conservation, biosecurity and ecological monitoring. However, morphological identification is constrained by taxonomic complexity, undescribed diversity, and limited expertise. DNA barcoding can alleviate some of these challenges and complement morphological identification, if reference data are comprehensive and reliable. We assessed the taxonomic, geographic and elevational coverage of New Zealand insect DNA barcodes using taxonomic names from the New Zealand Organisms Register, published estimates of undescribed species richness, and DNA barcode metadata. Only 18% of described native and exotic insect species currently have DNA barcodes, with higher coverage for exotic (59%) than native species (12%). DNA barcode coverage varies from complete in several single-species orders to very low in hyperdiverse orders such as Coleoptera (7%) and Diptera (5%), while moderately diverse aquatic orders reach 31%-91% coverage. Low elevation and populated regions are overrepresented in the DNA barcode data, and many species identifications are based on bioinformatic approaches rather than taxonomic or diagnostic expertise. Despite these biases, we propose that a complete national DNA barcode library for described insect species is highly achievable given access to well-curated insect collections and species name databases for tracking progress. Complete DNA barcoding of undescribed species will be more challenging and will require targeting underrepresented taxa, geographic regions and elevations. Sampling will need to incorporate field surveys with bulk specimen collection, environmental DNA, museomic approaches and expert-verified identifications. Completing this library will strengthen New Zealand's regional and national-scale biodiversity monitoring using environmental DNA, with important contributions to biosecurity and conservation outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.