ArticleGlobal medical genetics2026
RUNX1 upregulation and RUNX1-ETO depletion inhibits survival of t(8;21)-positive leukemia cells.
Article in Global medical genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is one of the most extensively studied AML subtypes, with the RUNX1-ETO fusion gene playing a crucial role in its pathogenesis. However, targeting this fusion gene alone has not yielded positive outcomes, likely because it fails to eliminate leukemia cells without restoring normal RUNX1 function. Objective: To enhance the therapeutic efficacy for this leukemia, we propose a novel strategy based on the pathogenic mechanism. We deliver RUNX1 small activating RNA (RUNX1‑saRNA) and RUNX1‑ETO small interfering RNA (RUNX1‑ETO‑siRNA) to RUNX1‑ETO‑positive AML cells, aiming to simultaneously silence the fusion gene and restore wild‑type RUNX1 expression. Methods: Kasumi‑1 cells were transfected with RUNX1‑saRNA and/or RUNX1‑ETO‑siRNA. The effects on apoptosis, autophagy, cell proliferation, and cell cycle progression were evaluated by Western blotting, CCK‑8 assays, and real‑time PCR. Results: Upregulation of RUNX1 promoted apoptosis and autophagy, inhibited proliferation, and blocked cell cycle progression. Similarly, downregulation of RUNX1-ETO produced comparable effects. The combined treatment resulted in enhanced effects compared with either intervention alone, with increased apoptosis and autophagy, and more pronounced inhibition of proliferation and cell cycle arrest. Conclusions: This combination therapy exerts potent cytotoxic effects on RUNX1-ETO-positive AML cells
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.