ReviewCureus2026
Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology: Applications in Diagnosis and Risk Prediction.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) continue to be a major cause of death and morbidity throughout the world, and there is an increasing need for better diagnostic and predictive approaches. Existing methods do not fully reflect complex clinical interactions, and new computational methods possess greater capabilities. The limitations, including a lack of diversity in datasets, low generalizability, and limited interpretability, limit general use in the clinic. The review highlights the latest developments in artificial intelligence (AI) for diagnosing and predicting cardiovascular risk factors, with a focus on its clinical applications and current challenges. A literature review was conducted on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) applications in imaging, electrocardiography (ECG), and predictive modeling. AI has been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy, facilitate earlier diagnosis, and enhance the ability to stratify disease risk compared with traditional methods. The seamless integration with wearable technologies ensures continuous monitoring and proactive management. While these developments help to ensure more accurate and individualized care, there are issues of validation, ethics, and integration. Moreover, integration of multi-modal data sources and real-time analytics enhances clinical decision-making and risk assessment. As technology continues to evolve, its scalability and applicability across various healthcare settings are expected to improve. In summary, AI has the potential to revolutionize cardiovascular care and enhance clinical outcomes by leveraging data-driven approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.