ArticleThe Journal of physiology2026
Effects of plasma donation on blood rheology and peripheral vascular function.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plasma donation, the removal of plasma and reinfusion of cellular components, is widely used to produce plasma-derived products; however its physiological effects on blood rheology and peripheral vascular function remain poorly understood. This study investigated the effects of plasma donation (Investigation 1) on blood viscosity, red blood cell (RBC) deformability and aggregation, and brachial artery reactive hyperaemia flow-mediated dilatation (RH-FMD), and compared these responses with those induced by frusemide-mediated haemoconcentration (40 mg; Investigation 2) to isolate the independent effects of plasma volume contraction. In Investigation 1, 15 participants (7 females; 25 ± 5 years) underwent plasma donation and were assessed at baseline, immediately after, and 24 h following donation. In Investigation 2, 13 participants (6 females; 24 ± 5 years) underwent diuresis (i.e. plasma contraction), with measurements taken pre- and 4 h following frusemide. Blood rheology parameters and RH-FMD were evaluated at each time point. Both interventions similarly increased haemoglobin (∼8%) and whole blood viscosity (7.6% post-donation; 13.1% post-diuresis, P<0.001), but neither altered shear stress, blood flow, or vascular reactivity. Plasma donation, but not plasma contraction, acutely reduced RBC deformability (theoretical maximum elongation index, P = 0.0403) and increased reactive hyperaemia (∼23%, P = 0.0386), with RBC deformability recovering (P = 0.589) and aggregation decreasing by 24 h (P = 0.0107). Systolic blood pressure declined following plasma donation (P = 0.0123) and remained reduced at 24 h (P = 0.0457), which was not observed following plasma contraction. These findings suggest that plasma donation transiently impairs RBC deformability, lowers systolic pressure, and enhances microvascular reactivity. These effects are unlikely driven by haemoconcentration and may instead reflect changes in macromolecules, RBC mechanics, or anticoagulants. KEY POINTS: Plasma donation is becoming increasingly common due to the global demand for plasma-derived therapeutics. Despite its widespread use, the consequences of plasma donation for blood rheology (e.g. red blood cell deformability) and vascular health remain poorly understood. In this study, we compared individuals who underwent plasma donation with those who ingested an oral diuretic, which reduced plasma volume through diuresis, to isolate the effects of haemoconcentration. Neither intervention altered most blood rheology or vascular function. However, plasma donation transiently reduced red blood cell deformability and enhanced microvascular function. These findings indicate that plasma donation does not adversely affect blood rheology or vascular function and may promote transient beneficial vascular effects, suggesting minimal impact on blood rheology and vascular function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.