Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42607051›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The COCCOS study: A protocol for a multicentric quasi-experimental study of a healthcare transition program for young people with chronic conditions.

Lisa Van Wilder, Natwarin Janssens, Kim Van Hoorenbeeck, Karsten Vanden Wyngaert, Eva Goossens, Delphine De Smedt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07145671 (The COCCOS Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07145671 narecruitingnot on this map

The COCCOS Study: Implementing and Evaluating a Transition Program for Young Persons With Chronic Conditions

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiteit AntwerpenRan2025 to 2026Enrolled150ConditionsType 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Obesity, AsthmaArmsTransition program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa Van WilderDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4394-2623
Natwarin JanssensDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4821-5444
Kim Van HoorenbeeckDepartment of Pediatrics, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8812-4440
Karsten Vanden WyngaertGhent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Eva GoossensDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Delphine De SmedtDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe growing number of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) living with chronic conditions highlights the need for effective healthcare transition programmes (TPs) to support the transfer from paediatric to adult care. Despite existing recommendations, many AYAs experience inadequate preparation, resulting in disrupted care and adverse health outcomes. The COCCOS project developed a co-designed TP to address these challenges. This study presents the protocol for an evaluation of this programme. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentric quasi-experimental pretest-posttest study will be conducted in two Belgian university hospitals. AYAs aged 17-18 years with type 1 diabetes, asthma, or obesity will be recruited into an intervention group receiving the COCCOS TP or a control group receiving usual care. The intervention consists of four structured consultations over 13-16 months, focusing on transition preparation, autonomy, and continuity of care. Primary outcome is transition readiness, measured using the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include patient empowerment, medication adherence, health-related quality of life, and mental health. Data will be collected at baseline, transfer, and four months post-transfer. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed from a healthcare payer perspective using quality-adjusted life years. A mixed-methods process evaluation will examine implementation fidelity, acceptability, and contextual factors through observations, surveys, and interviews. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT07145671. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionThis study will provide comprehensive evidence on the feasibility, preliminary effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and implementation of a co-designed TP in real-world clinical practice. By integrating clinical, economic, and process outcomes, it addresses key gaps in transitional care research. Findings will inform refinement of the programme and the design of a future large-scale trial, contributing to the development of sustainable, patient-centred transition care for AYAs with chronic conditions.

Indexed as

Transition to Adult CareAdolescentAsthmaBelgiumChronic DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicObesityQuality of LifeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42607051
PMCPMC13480643

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.