ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
IBAS: Interaction-bridged association studies discovering novel genes underlying complex traits.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic contributions to complex traits are often mediated through coordinated gene-gene interaction networks, yet most existing association frameworks focus on marginal single-gene effects and overlook higher-order dependency structures. Direct modeling of interactions remains challenging due to combinatorial complexity and statistical instability. We introduce Interaction-Bridged Association Study (IBAS), a general framework that incorporates pathway-level interaction patterns into genotype-phenotype association analysis without explicitly enumerating interactions. IBAS leverages transcriptomic reference data to construct low-dimensional representations of pathway activity, which guide SNP-weighting and gene-level association testing within a kernel-based framework. In perturbation-based simulations, IBAS demonstrates improved stability and reproducibility compared to conventional TWAS and gene-based methods, while maintaining well-calibrated Type I error under phenotype permutation. Application to the WTCCC datasets identifies both known and novel genes across multiple complex diseases, including candidates with modest marginal effects missed by standard approaches. These findings are supported by replication in an independent cohort, and analyses across multiple reference tissues revealing both shared and tissue-specific signals. Overall, IBAS provides a statistically robust and computationally tractable framework for incorporating interaction effects into association mapping, extending beyond the single-gene paradigm and enabling more comprehensive characterization of complex trait. IBAS is available on GitHub at: https://github.com/QingrunZhangLab/IBAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.