Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42607286›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

Acceptability, Usability, and Clinical Appropriateness of an AI-Powered Tool for Linkage to HIV Services After HIV Self-Testing in South Africa: Mixed Methods Evaluation.

Nomsa Brightness Mahlalela, Onthatile Maboa, Caroline Govathson, Laura Rossouw, Lawrence Long, Ross Greener, Sarah Morris, Shawna Cooper, Sasha Frade, Sophie Pascoe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nomsa Brightness MahlalelaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office (HE²RO), School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Sunnyside Office Park Building C, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa, 27 769822046.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6185-1122
Onthatile MaboaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office (HE²RO), School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Sunnyside Office Park Building C, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa, 27 769822046.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0425-7474
Caroline GovathsonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office (HE²RO), School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Sunnyside Office Park Building C, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa, 27 769822046.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2595-1913
Laura RossouwDepartment of Internal Medicine, Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office (HE²RO), School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Sunnyside Office Park Building C, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa, 27 769822046.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7697-9567
Lawrence LongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office (HE²RO), School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Sunnyside Office Park Building C, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa, 27 769822046.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4986-4988
Ross GreenerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office (HE²RO), School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Sunnyside Office Park Building C, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa, 27 769822046.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8997-8977
Sarah MorrisProduct & Strategy, Audere, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7179-6445
Shawna CooperProduct & Strategy, Audere, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6371-5301
Sasha FradeResearch, Monitoring and Evaluation, Audere Africa, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9683-3020
Sophie PascoeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office (HE²RO), School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Sunnyside Office Park Building C, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa, 27 769822046.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9199-8333
Candice Chetty-MakkanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office (HE²RO), School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Sunnyside Office Park Building C, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa, 27 769822046.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9292-9586

Funding

Using behavioral economics to improve the uptake of and persistence on pre-exposure prophylaxis in men who have sex with men to prevent HIV infectionK01MH119923 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI LONG, LAWRENCE CAMDON · 2020 to 2024
$865k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH119923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Timely linkage to HIV prevention and treatment services following HIV self-testing (HIVST) remains a challenge in many countries. While HIVST offers privacy and convenience for individuals to know their HIV status, many do not engage in follow-up care due to behavioral barriers like uncertainty about next steps, stigma, and privacy concerns. Objective: This study evaluated the acceptability, usability, and clinical appropriateness of Your Path, an AI-powered tool designed to facilitate access to HIV services following HIVST. Methods: This study was conducted with community members and health care providers, recruited from Indlela's Behavioral Hub in South Africa. Community members were randomly assigned a mock HIV result and completed a pretest survey assessing intentions to seek HIV services, followed by a simulated HIVST guided by Your Path Results: A sample of 100 community members aged between 18 and 61 years was enrolled: 59 (59%) were female, and 51 (51%) were assigned a negative mock HIV result. Overall, the intervention had its strongest effect on participants' confidence in accessing HIV services, particularly among those with HIV-negative results (Wilcoxon Conclusions: Your Path was acceptable, usable, and clinically appropriate for supporting access to HIV services after HIVST. Larger in-field studies are needed to understand the implementation, cost, and sustainability of digital interventions in public health.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHIV InfectionsHIV TestingPatient Acceptance of Health CareSelf-TestingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSouth AfricaYoung Adultacceptabilityartificial intelligencedigital healthHIV self-testingSouth Africausability

Identifiers

PMID42607286
PMCPMC13480700

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.