ArticleScientific reports2026
Task-irrelevant stimuli robustly drive phasic pupil-linked arousal but only weakly affect memory formation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brainstem arousal systems including the locus coeruleus noradrenaline system, respond transiently to behaviorally relevant events. This also drives dilations of the pupil, which are often observed during cognitive tasks. The strength of pupil responses during encoding of stimulus material predicts the success of its later retrieval, which might reflect the impact of noradrenaline on synaptic plasticity and memory formation. The pupil also dilates in response to task-irrelevant sounds, which could therefore serve as a valuable tool for investigating causal effects of phasic, pupil-linked arousal on cognition. Here, we evaluated whether task-irrelevant white noise sounds affect memory formation and memory-based decisions. These sounds were played before, during or after the presentation of memoranda (images or spoken words). Memory success was measured in recognition and free recall tasks the day after. Trial-to-trial variations in the amplitude of pupil dilations during word encoding in the absence of task-irrelevant sounds predicted memory success. Task-irrelevant white-noise sounds also robustly dilated the pupil but did not yield strong evidence of improved memory success: later recall of words was unaffected, and recall of images was weakly boosted only when the sounds were presented concurrently with them. Our results suggest that pupil-linked arousal processes triggered by task-irrelevant sounds differ from those recruited endogenously during memory formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.