Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42608457›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of obesity (2005)2026

GLP-1 receptor agonists and the emergence of treatment-related stigma: a call for conceptual clarity.

Stacy M Post

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of obesity (2005), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stacy M PostGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA. smp352@georgetown.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6972-2077

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although GLP-1 medications have transformed obesity treatment, their rapid expansion has occurred alongside moral narratives emphasizing discipline, willpower, and personal responsibility in weight management. These narratives often portray GLP-1-assisted weight loss as a "shortcut" or as "taking the easy way out" compared to lifestyle-based approaches such as diet and exercise. Such perceptions reflect broader weight stigmatizing attitudes; however, GLP-1-related stigma represents an emerging and distinct form of weight stigma in which judgments extend beyond body size to include the perceived legitimacy and moral worthiness of pharmacologic weight management. This compounded form of stigma may exacerbate negative physical and mental health impacts and GLP-1 treatment engagement beyond those associated with weight stigma alone, potentially creating new barriers to effective obesity care. Researchers across obesity, behavioral medicine, and psychosocial health are uniquely positioned to investigate the conceptual and psychometric similarities and differences between weight-based and GLP-1-related stigma. Such efforts will advance the understanding of this emerging phenomenon and improve the health and well-being of individuals with obesity using or considering GLP-1 therapies.

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.