Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42608592›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Does increased staging complexity influence expert agreement in dental age estimation?

Nikolaos Angelakopoulos, Rizky Merdietio Boedi, Stefano De Luca, Nikita Polukhin, Akiko Kumagai, Ivan Galic, Jeta Kelmendi, Israel Soriano Vázquez, Aida Hadzic Selmanagić, Jorge Pinares Toledo and 11 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Nikolaos AngelakopoulosDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. nikolaos.angelakopoulos@unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8511-4645
Rizky Merdietio BoediDepartment of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5045-6773
Stefano De LucaArea of Physical Anthropology, Department of Organisms and Systems Biology, Faculty of Biology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1725-0853
Nikita PolukhinDepartment of Public Health and Medical Social Sciences, Synergy University, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9540-5793
Akiko KumagaiDivision of Forensic Odontology and Disaster Oral Medicine, Department of Forensic Science, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3021-4443
Ivan GalicDepartment of Oral Surgery, School of Medicine, University Hospital of Split, University of Split, Split, Croatia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0387-9535
Jeta KelmendiDepartment of Orthodontics, University Dentistry Clinical Center of Kosovo, Pristina, 10000, Kosovo.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7622-5324
Israel Soriano VázquezForensic Odontologist, Independent Researcher, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2603-5950
Aida Hadzic SelmanagićDepartment of Dental Morphology with Dental Anthropology and Forensics Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5819-4870
Jorge Pinares ToledoDepartamento de Patologia y Medicina Oral, Facultad de Odontologia, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1705-7893
Roberto ScendoniDepartment of Law, Institute of Legal Medicine (AgEstimation Project), University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1910-2405
Daniel FranklinCentre for Forensic Anthropology, School of Social Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2605-1343
Roberta Araujo PintoDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8688-7797
Lourdes Gómez JiménezInstituto Nacional de Patología "Dr. Sergio Sarita Valdez", Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7117-476X
Arjeta NeziriIndependent Researcher, Pristina, Kosovo.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3061-9052
Emerson RodriguesDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4994-9469
Pisha PittayapatDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9607-5450
Pedro Manuel Garamendi-GonzálezInstituto de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses de Huelva, Huelva, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3310-1700
Joe Adserias-GarrigaDepartment of Applied Forensic Science, Mercyhurst University, Erie, PA, 16546, USA.
Bernhard KnellUniversity of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ademir FrancoDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1417-2781

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental age estimation (DAE) is a well-established procedure in current practice, and it is frequently required in forensic and legal investigations. This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer reliability of dental development staging among forensic practitioners using two widely applied staging systems, according to Demirjian et al. 1973 and Moorrees et al. 1963. The study included 250 anonymized panoramic radiographs of individuals between 6 and 14 years (median age, 10 years), comprising 51.2% males and 48.8% females. Eighteen observers with prior training in DAE independently assessed tooth development on panoramic radiographs using the Demirjian and Moorrees methods, with each method evaluated in two separate rounds. Intra-observer reliability was evaluated using weighted and unweighted Cohen's Kappa, while inter-observer agreement was assessed using Gwet's AC1 and AC2 coefficients. Weighted analyses accounted for the ordinal structure of developmental stages, whereas unweighted analyses reflected exact agreement. Intra-observer reliability was consistently high across both systems, with median weighted Cohen's Kappa values ranging from 0.897 to 0.957 and median unweighted Cohen's Kappa values ranging from 0.836 to 0.944. Inter-observer agreement values averaged across rounds assessed with Gwet's AC2 ranged from 0.914 to 0.987, whereas mean Gwet's AC1 ranged from 0.306 to 0.908, indicating that disagreement was primarily due to adjacent-stage differences. Moorrees staging showed slightly higher reliability under weighted conditions, while Demirjian demonstrated higher exact agreement under unweighted conditions. Agreement increased with the number of observers but reached a plateau at approximately 8-10 observers, suggesting an optimal number of observers for forensic consensus. The results indicated that difficulty in distinguishing adjacent stages, unclear stage boundaries, and overlapping anatomical structures were the main sources of uncertainty. The Moorrees system was perceived as more complex, while Demirjian showed difficulty focused on the root development stages. These findings highlight the importance of methodological considerations in dental age estimation and suggest that refinement of staging systems may further improve the reliability of expert assessment.

Indexed as

AgeForensic DentistryRadiographReliabilityTeeth

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.