Trial reportDiabetologia2026
A multi-centre study of belatacept and sirolimus for islet transplantation.
Trial report in Diabetologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aims/hypothesisIslet transplantation is an appropriate treatment for selected individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus and hypoglycaemia unawareness. The gold standard of maintenance immunosuppression to prevent allograft rejection is calcineurin inhibitor-based therapy; however, side effects warrant exploration of alternative immunosuppression. The co-stimulatory blocker belatacept and the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor sirolimus have demonstrated clinical benefit in solid organ transplantation, but efficacy in human islet transplantation is unknown.
methodsWe conducted a non-randomised, phase 2, multi-centre, open-label clinical study. Participants with type 1 diabetes receiving at least one islet transplant were treated with belatacept/sirolimus (bela/siro) and compared with a contemporaneous cohort treated with tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (tac/MMF). The primary outcome was freedom from hypoglycaemia, with positive C-peptide and HbA
resultsNine participants with type 1 diabetes received bela/siro, compared with 24 receiving tac/MMF. Eight participants (89%) receiving bela/siro achieved the primary outcome compared with 12 (52%) from the tac/MMF cohort. HbA CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationBaseline immunosuppression with bela/siro facilitated early islet engraftment and rates of insulin independence, with less impact on renal function, supporting the rationale for routine use in islet transplantation.
trial registrationANZCTR.org.au ACTRN12619000268145.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.