Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42608682›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Service users' perspectives on acute, outreach and outpatient psychiatric crisis interventions with and without peer support: results of a qualitative study.

Lena-Katharina Oeltjen, Georg Knigge, Maike Schulz, Imke Heuer, Timm Neeland, Jasmina Schmidt, Claudia Römer, Kay Bultmann, Jörg Utschakowski, Candelaria Mahlke and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lena-Katharina OeltjenDepartment for Health Services Research, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany. lena.oeltjen@uni-bremen.de.
Georg KniggeClinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Eppendorf, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Maike SchulzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hospital Bremen-Ost, Gesundheit Nord Klinikverbund Bremen gGmbH (GeNo), Bremen, Germany.
Imke HeuerClinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Eppendorf, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Timm NeelandDepartment for Health Services Research, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Jasmina SchmidtClinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Eppendorf, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Claudia RömerClinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Eppendorf, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Kay BultmannPublic Health Department Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Jörg UtschakowskiMinistry of Health, Women and Consumer Protection, Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Bremen, Germany.
Candelaria MahlkeClinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Eppendorf, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Ansgar GerhardusDepartment for Health Services Research, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCrisis intervention teams assist individuals in acute mental health crises. If unavailable or situations escalate, the police may be involved, and compulsory admissions may be initiated in case of risk to self or others. - measures often perceived as stigmatizing and traumatizing. Respectful, empathetic interactions can prevent escalation and reduce coercion. Peer support, by individuals with lived experience, can enhance recovery, improve quality of life, and reduce coercive measures. In the city of Bremen, the Crisis Intervention Service (CIS) handles emergencies via mobile teams or outpatient consultations. The "PeerIntervent" project integrated trained peer support workers (PSW) into two regional Crisis Intervention Service (CIS) teams. This study examines how individuals with severe mental health conditions experience care during acute, outreach and outpatient psychiatric crises.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 individuals recently affected by psychiatric crisis interventions and analysed using qualitative content analysis.

resultsCIS was involved in all cases; PSW in six cases, police in eight. Empathic listening, calm communication, transparent explanations, and involvement in decision-making were described as supportive. Confrontational communication or insufficient information was experienced as distressing. Structural factors, including staff continuity and the waiting environment, also shaped overall experiences. Peer support was largely perceived positively, with the sharing of lived experience associated with authenticity and hope. Experiences with police were described ambivalently, ranging from reassuring and supportive to intrusive and escalating.

conclusionFindings highlight the importance of calm, empathic, and transparent communication for trust and perceived safety, supporting the need to strengthen targeted training for all crisis care providers, including police. In line with prior research, PSW may complement crisis care by providing experiential credibility and hope, but their use should remain context-sensitive and requires further study.

trial registrationThe study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Bremen on June 20, 2022 (reference: 2022-09) and was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) on July 4, 2022 (DRKS00029377).

Indexed as

Crisis InterventionMental DisordersPeer GroupSocial SupportAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPoliceQualitative ResearchCoercionLived experiencePeer supportPolice involvementPsychiatric crisis interventionQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID42608682
PMCPMC13479813

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.