Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42609229›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The lingering effects of perceived daily negative workplace gossip on next-day work alienation in China: a dual-pathway perspective of rumination and emotion.

Waiseng Lou, Tingya He, Guiquan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Waiseng LouSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Tingya HeSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Guiquan LiSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Existing research has predominantly confined its scope to the immediate, detrimental consequences of daily negative workplace gossip, largely overlooking its lingering effects. To address this critical limitation, we present a dual-pathway model grounded in the cognitive theory of rumination. By conceptualizing negative gossip as a signal of interpersonal "goal failure," we suggest its effects are more nuanced and enduring than previously assumed. Methods: We examined how negative gossip triggers distinct overnight responses through a multi-method approach. Study 1 employed an online recall experiment with 132 employees to establish the causal effect of negative gossip on two distinct forms of post-work information processing: problem-solving pondering and affective rumination. Building upon this, Study 2 utilized a daily diary design with 139 employees over 9 days to dynamically examine the lagged effects of these cognitive processes. Results: Study 1 demonstrated that perceived negative gossip causes employees to engage in both problem-solving pondering and affective rumination. Multilevel analyses in Study 2 revealed that these lingering effects unfold in opposing directions: problem-solving pondering at night fosters strong emotion the next morning, which subsequently reduces work alienation. Conversely, affective rumination precipitates distress emotion the next morning, thereby exacerbating work alienation. Discussion: These findings offer critical insights into the enduring and dual-edged nature of workplace gossip. By identifying the sequential cognitive-affective chains during and after non-work time, this study expands theoretical understandings of how daily gossip shapes next-day work experiences through both maladaptive strain and constructive mobilization.

Indexed as

affective ruminationdiscrete emotionlingering effectperceived negative workplace gossipproblem-solving pondering

Identifiers

PMID42609229
PMCPMC13477891

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.