ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Machine learning-based diagnostic models for prevalent metabolic syndrome among patients with disuse muscle atrophy: a comparative study of seven algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Disuse muscle atrophy (DMA) leads to muscle loss and impaired motor function, while metabolic syndrome (MetS) increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Muscle loss exacerbates insulin resistance, accelerates MetS progression, and creates a vicious cycle. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for identifying prevalent MetS in patients with DMA. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted using data from 1,004 patients who visited the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine at four medical institutions in Urumqi, Xinjiang, between January 2018 and June 2024. The data were randomly divided into a training set ( Results: The prevalence of Mets among patients with DMA was 45.72%, eight key predictors were identified. The RF model demonstrated the best discriminatory performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.961 (95% CI: 0.938-0.979), accuracy of 90.0%, precision of 92.8%, sensitivity of 84.7%, specificity of 94.5%, and F1 score of 88.5%. The top five predictors identified by SHAP analysis were waist circumference, blood glucose, Cardiometabolic Index (CMI), High-density lipoprotein (HDL), and Triglyceride-Glucose index (TyG). Conclusion: We developed an interpretable ML model to aid in the early diagnosis of MetS. Among the models, particularly RF, showed outstanding predictive performance and promising application potential. It provides a practical tool for the early identification and targeted intervention, supports clinical decision-making, and promotes more rational allocation of healthcare resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.