Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42609378›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging2026

Promoting physical activity and physical functioning among residents in nursing homes - lessons learnt by the PROGRESS project.

Vera Belkin, Berit K Labott, Claudia Voelcker-Rehage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vera Belkin *Department of Neuromotor Behavior and Exercise, Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Berit K Labott *Department of Neuromotor Behavior and Exercise, Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Claudia Voelcker-RehageDepartment of Neuromotor Behavior and Exercise, Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nursing home residents show high sedentary behavior and limited physical functioning, while structural constraints hinder sustainable prevention. This study examined how group-based physical exercise and environmental interventions, such as activity-promoting materials and interior design, can be integrated into everyday care to promote a physical activity-promoting culture in nursing homes and identified key organizational and individual determinants of sustainable implementation. Methods: PROGRESS was a participatory, cluster-randomized cross-over trial conducted in seven nursing homes in the Münster area in Germany. Residents received two of four guided or non-guided exercise (n = 62) and/or environmental interventions (e.g., activity posters, a seated bike ergometer, walking brochures/routes; n = 65). Data from attendance logs, participatory workshops, and a follow-up questionnaire at t4 (the fourth and final measurement time point, approximately 50 weeks after baseline assessment; n = 73) were analyzed using descriptive statistics and structured content analysis for open-ended feedback. Based on these findings, the PROGRESS pyramid was developed as a framework for sustainable implementation of physical activity into everyday care. Results: Of the 73 participants, 90.4% attended at least one guided intervention session. Participation was highest in the exercise intervention, with most residents reporting weekly engagement. In contrast, engagement with environmental interventions was more variable and strongly dependent on staff support, with 63.0% of residents reporting no independent use of physical activity opportunities. Comparisons between self-reported participation and attendance records revealed substantial discrepancies, particularly for environmental interventions. Overall satisfaction with the project was high (mean = 2.7 ± 2.5 on a 0 = happy to 10 = angry scale). Most participants supported continuation of the interventions (86.0%), and 64.0% reported perceived personal benefits. Organizational and individual determinants jointly shaped participation. Conclusion: In order to promote physical activity and functioning sustainably in nursing homes, it is necessary to address organizational conditions and individual needs in a coordinated manner. The PROGRESS pyramid translates these findings into a practical framework comprising organizational and communicational foundations, resident participation, education, and staff qualification to guide the long-term integration of exercise and environmental interventions into daily routine.

Indexed as

environmental interventionexercise interventionhealth promotionhealthy ageinginpatient care facilityorganizational readinessprimary prevention

Identifiers

PMID42609378
PMCPMC13478141

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.