ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Immunomodulatory effects of medicinal and edible plants in autoimmune diseases: mechanisms and therapeutic potential.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autoimmune diseases (ADs) and related immune-mediated inflammatory disorders are characterized by loss of immune tolerance, persistent inflammatory activation, immune-cell imbalance, oxidative stress, and tissue-specific injury. Although conventional immunomodulatory therapies remain central to disease management, their long-term use may be limited by adverse effects, variable treatment responses, and high costs. Medicinal and edible plants (MEPs) provide a diverse source of bioactive compounds with potential immunoregulatory activity. This narrative review summarizes the immunological basis of representative autoimmune and immune-mediated inflammatory disorders and critically evaluates the mechanisms, therapeutic potential, and translational limitations of selected MEPs and their major active constituents. Current evidence indicates that MEP-derived interventions commonly regulate NF-κB, MAPK, JAK/STAT, and NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome signaling, while also modulating imbalances in Th17/Treg and Th1/Th2 responses, oxidative stress, and tissue barrier dysfunction. In addition to these shared mechanisms, several disease-relevant regulatory patterns have emerged, including high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) inhibition in lupus-associated renal injury, regulation of histone lactylation and ferroptosis in rheumatoid arthritis-associated synovial pathology, neutrophil modulation in inflammatory arthritis, and intestinal protection mediated by the microbiota-metabolite-aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) axis in colitis. However, most available evidence is derived from cellular and animal studies, whereas high-quality clinical data remain limited. Poor bioavailability, variable chemical composition, insufficient formulation and dosage standardization, incomplete safety evaluation, and regulatory challenges continue to hinder clinical translation. MEPs therefore represent promising sources of adjunctive immunomodulatory strategies for ADs, but their therapeutic value requires further validation through standardized mechanistic studies and well-designed clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.