ReviewCancer management and research2026
Cross-Cancer Detectability of ctDNA Biomarkers in Asian Populations: Implications for Pan-Cancer Detection.
Review in Cancer management and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cancer remains a leading cause of global mortality, making early detection essential for improvingpatient outcomes. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a minimally invasive liquid biopsy approach for cancer detection and monitoring. Nevertheless, current ctDNA research is dominated by mutation-based analyses, which tend to be highly heterogeneous across cancer types and may therefore limit their usefulness for pan-cancer detection. Objective: This review aimed to map ctDNA-detected gene biomarkers across cancer types in Asian populations and to identify genomic alteration patterns with potential relevance for pan-cancer detection. Methods: Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, PubMed was systematically searched for studies investigating tumor-specific ctDNA in Asian cancer populations. Data were extracted at the gene-event level, treating each reported genomic alteration as an independent evidence entry. Genes, alteration types, and associated cancer types were synthesize using a descriptive frequency-based evidence mapping approach. Reported clinical relevance was also summarized to provide clinical context for the identified biomarkers. Results: A total of 100 studies identified 113 ctDNA biomarkers across 23 cancer types, with lung, colorectal, and breast cancers being the most frequently investigated. Mutation events were the most commonly reported, reflecting the dominance of mutation-focused ctDNA assays. However, mutation profiles were highly heterogeneous and largely cancer-specific. In contrast, gene amplification events, particularly involving Conclusion: This descriptive evidence mapping suggests that the potential relevance of ctDNA biomarkers in Asian populations may depend more on the type of genomic alteration than on gene-reporting frequency alone. Mutation-based ctDNA biomarkers were predominantly associated with tumor-specific applications, whereas amplification-based alterations were observed across multiple cancer types. These findings provide a framework for future biomarker prioritization for cancer detection and require validation through studies evaluating clinical performance and prospective implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.