ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2026
The effects of SARS-CoV-2 on bone homeostasis.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accumulating evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 is associated with disruptions in skeletal homeostasis through both direct viral effects on bone-remodeling cells and indirect inflammatory mechanisms, contributing to bone loss and increased skeletal fragility. The maintenance of healthy bone structure depends on the coordinated activities of bone-resorbing osteoclasts and bone-forming osteoblasts. Recent studies demonstrate that differentiated human osteoblasts support productive SARS-CoV-2 infection, whereas MSC and osteoclast precursors undergo abortive infection. These interactions impair osteoblast differentiation, increase IL-6 and receptor activator of nuclear factor κB Ligand (RANKL) expression, and promote osteoclastogenesis, shifting bone remodeling toward pathological resorption. Additional virus-associated mediators, including Spike protein, ORF8, and miR-4485-3p, further amplify inflammatory and pro-osteoclastogenic signaling. Clinical studies report associations between acute and persistent reductions in bone mineral density, increased vertebral fracture prevalence, and alterations in musculoskeletal (MSK) imaging biomarkers associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes, while animal models confirm osteoclast-driven trabecular bone loss. This review integrates emerging evidence of productive and abortive SARS-CoV-2 infection of human bone cells with recent clinical and experimental findings, providing an updated osteoimmunological perspective on COVID-19-associated bone remodeling. Prospective longitudinal studies and clinical trials are needed to determine the long-term skeletal consequences of COVID-19 and evaluate targeted strategies to prevent infection-associated bone loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.