Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42609984›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2026

CycleMix: Gaussian mixture modeling of the cell cycle.

Jack Edward Peplinski, Tallulah S Andrews

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jack Edward PeplinskiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering & Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Tallulah S AndrewsDepartment of Biochemistry, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentisrty, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1120-2196

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: The cell cycle is a crucial component of many biological processes, including cancer, tissue repair, and inflammation. However, due to the heterogeneity of this cycle it has been difficult to assess the extent of proliferation in clinical tissues. Single-cell RNAseq (scRNAseq) and spatial transcriptomics enable high resolution measurement of gene expression enabling the classification of individual cells into their cycling state. However, current methods are limited to classifying cells into only three states: G1, S, G2M and have unproven accuracy on modern datasets. Results: We show that Seurat and Cyclone the most widely used methods for cell cycle assignment have poor performance on modern droplet-based datasets. In particular, Seurat frequently labels mature non-cycling cells (e.g. neurons) as actively cycling. We present CycleMix, an alternative cell cycle assignment algorithm that can flexibly assign cells into any number of states provided sufficient marker genes as well as being capable of identifying when cells are not cycling. We demonstrate its superior performance for cell cycle assignment and regression of cell cycle expression patterns on six diverse droplet-based scRNAseq datasets. Availability and implementation: CycleMix is available as an R package on Bioconductor, and on github: https://github.com/tallulandrews/CycleMix.

Identifiers

PMID42609984
PMCPMC13479747

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.