Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42609998›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Spatio-temporal analysis of dengue outbreaks in India (2021-2025): evidence from the secondary analysis of Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme.

Shrinivasa B Marinaik, Vani H Chalageri, Preethi R Reval, VidyaShree Manjunath, Harshitha Jithendra, Avinash Manjunath, Kajol Bankoti, Gunjan Negi, Viprasha Tomer, Anup Anvikar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shrinivasa B MarinaikICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, Bengaluru, Karnatak, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3908-4857
Vani H ChalageriICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, Bengaluru, Karnatak, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1439-8836
Preethi R RevalSchool of Public Health, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0009-0005-1812-3337
VidyaShree ManjunathSchool of Public Health, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
Harshitha JithendraICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, Bengaluru, Karnatak, India.
Avinash ManjunathICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, Bengaluru, Karnatak, India.
Kajol BankotiICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, Bengaluru, Karnatak, India.
Gunjan NegiICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, Bengaluru, Karnatak, India.
Viprasha TomerICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, Field Unit, Bengaluru, Karnatak, India.
Anup AnvikarICMR - National Institute of Malaria Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Dengue fever is an emerging public health challenge in India, with outbreaks influenced by environmental factors. Understanding these dynamics is essential to advance from containment to early warning systems. The study aimed to (1) categorising outbreaks by Indian Meteorological Department climatic zones to assess burden; (2) mapping transmission architecture via Global Moran's I, Getis-Ord Gi Hotspot Analysis, spatial network graphs (K-nearest neighbour, distance threshold, minimum spanning trees (MSTs)) and degree centrality and (3) calculating velocity, measured by effective reproductive number ( Methods: The study analysed weekly outbreak reports from a national-level report from the Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme between 2021 and 2025. Results: Analysis of 774 outbreaks (35 202 cases; 195 deaths; case fatality rate (CFR): 0.55%) identified transmission patterns. Maharashtra and Kerala accounted for 52.4% of all outbreaks, with South Peninsular states recording pre-monsoon transmission windows. Rural transmission correlated with a CFR (3.08%) compared with urban clusters (0.29%), indicating case ascertainment bias. MST topology identified 'super-spreader' district hubs that served as focal points for dissemination. These hubs accelerated transmission with effective reproductive number ( Conclusion: Integrating syndromic data with climatic classifications, spatial network topology and Bayesian

Indexed as

Basic Reproduction NumberDisease OutbreaksDisease VectorsSentinel SurveillanceSpace-Time Clustering

Identifiers

PMID42609998
PMCPMC13479492

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.