ArticleJournal of inflammation research2026
Internal Validation of Preoperative Inflammation-Nutrition Markers for Predicting Complications After Complex Lower-Extremity Wound Reconstruction.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Complications after complex lower-extremity wound reconstruction remain common in clinically heterogeneous adult patients, many of whom are older and multimorbid. We evaluated whether adding the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and prognostic nutritional index to a prespecified clinical baseline model improves internally validated prediction of 30-day clinically significant reconstruction-related complications. Methods: In a prospective single-center cohort from 2021 to 2024, consecutive adults undergoing complex lower-extremity reconstruction were enrolled. The C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and prognostic nutritional index were calculated from routine preoperative laboratories. A ridge-penalized logistic regression clinical baseline model was compared with an augmented model adding log-transformed C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and prognostic nutritional index. Internal validation used 5-fold cross-validation with out-of-fold predictions. Performance was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Brier score; calibration and decision-curve analyses were interpreted descriptively from the internally validated predictions. Log-transformed C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio was used as a monotonic skewness-reducing transformation rather than as a broader nonlinear biologic model. Results: Among 693 patients (median age 70.7 years; 62.3% male), 139 (20.1%) met the composite endpoint. Infection, necrosis, and additional unplanned interventions occurred in 12.1%, 7.6%, and 10.2%, respectively (non-mutually exclusive). The C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio was higher (median 0.55 vs 0.19) and the prognostic nutritional index lower (43.2±4.2 vs 46.1±4.5) in patients with complications. With the augmented model, higher log-transformed C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and lower prognostic nutritional index shifted predicted risk in the expected direction. The augmented model improved discrimination from AUC 0.71 (0.65-0.75) to 0.79 (0.75-0.83), reduced Brier score (0.132 vs 0.147), and showed higher net benefit than the baseline model across an approximate 10-35% threshold range in exploratory decision-curve analysis. Conclusion: Routine preoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and prognostic nutritional index may provide potentially useful incremental prognostic information for early complications after complex lower-extremity wound reconstruction, should be interpreted alongside clinical judgment, and external validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.