ReviewIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
Critique of the Peaceful End-of-Life Theory Using Meleis' 2012 Approach.
Review in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Providing a peaceful end of life while preserving dignity is a fundamental goal of nursing care. The Peaceful End-of-Life Theory (PELT) offers a middle-range theoretical framework to guide holistic nursing care for terminally ill patients. Despite its broad application, this theory has not yet been systematically critiqued using Meleis' theory analysis framework. Materials and Methods: This study presents a theoretical discussion employing a structured critique based on Afaf Meleis' (2012) theory analysis framework. The structural and functional components of PELT-including its concepts, assumptions, propositions, inner dimensions, clarity, consistency, practical, educational, and research utility, as well as empirical support-were systematically examined. The primary source of analysis was the original theory article by Ruland and Moore (1998), supported by relevant theoretical and empirical literature. Results: The analysis identified PELT as a coherent and internally consistent middle-range theory that effectively links nursing interventions to holistic patient outcomes such as pain relief, comfort, dignity, peace, and closeness to significant others. However, several limitations were noted, including insufficient operational guidance for prioritizing interventions, challenges in measuring culturally sensitive concepts such as peace and comfort, and systemic barriers to implementation such as nursing shortages and misalignment with diagnosis-focused reimbursement systems. Conclusions: Although PELT provides a valuable conceptual framework for guiding end-of-life nursing care, its effective application requires further development of context-specific clinical guidelines, culturally sensitive and validated assessment tools, and supportive health policies that acknowledge the interdisciplinary and resource-intensive nature of palliative care. Addressing these gaps may enhance the theory's practical applicability and contribute to more equitable and dignified end-of-life care across diverse settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.