ReviewArchives of microbiology2026
Recent advances in the defense mechanisms of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in antibiotic-contaminated soil ecosystems.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are important soil symbionts that support plant nutrient acquisition, stress tolerance, and soil ecosystem stability. The increasing accumulation of antibiotic residues in agricultural soils may inhibit AMF spore germination, hyphal development, and root colonization, thereby weakening mycorrhizal functions and plant-soil feedback. This review summarizes recent advances in AMF responses to antibiotic stress in soil ecosystems and proposes a five-layer defense framework: external interfacial barriers, intracellular metabolic detoxification, antioxidant defense system activation, molecular regulation, and symbiont-level cooperative defense. We emphasize that the evidentiary strength supporting these mechanisms varies across different validation levels. Some responses, such as changes in colonization, hyphal growth, antioxidant enzyme activity, and rhizosphere or hyphosphere microbial communities, have been experimentally observed in antibiotic-contaminated systems. By contrast, several intracellular detoxification and regulatory processes, including pathways mediated by cytochrome P450s (P450s), glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), UDP-glycosyltransferases (UGTs), and transporters, remain primarily inferred from AMF genomic resources, host-symbiont studies, and fungal or plant xenobiotic metabolism studies. Current research is still limited by short-term experimental designs, a strong focus on tetracycline, insufficient molecular validation, and a lack of predictive models. Future studies should integrate multi-omics, single-cell approaches, and artificial intelligence-assisted modelling to identify key functional genes, distinguish direct AMF responses from host- or microbiome-mediated effects, and improve the application of AMF in sustainable remediation of antibiotic-contaminated soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42611050What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.