Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42611363›Full record

ReviewReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2026

Beyond weight: a stigma-free, integrated approach to obesity in patients affected by cancer.

Mikiko Watanabe, Edoardo Mocini, Carla Di Dato, Fiammetta Cipriani, Maria Grazia Tarsitano, Silvia Migliaccio, Andrea G Lania, Gianluca Aimaretti, Roberto Baldelli

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mikiko WatanabeDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Medical Pathophysiology, Food Science and Endocrinology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, 00161, Italy.
Edoardo MociniDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Sciences (DiSTA), eCampus University, Via Isimbardi 10, Novedrate (CO), 22060, Italy.
Carla Di DatoSanto Spirito Hospital, Department of Medical Specialties, Unit of Endocrinology, Rome, Italy.
Fiammetta CiprianiEndocrinology Unit, Department of Oncology and Medical Specialties, Rome, Italy.
Maria Grazia TarsitanoDepartment for the Promotion of Human Sciences and Quality of Life, San Raffaele Roma University, Rome, Italy. mariagrazia.tarsitano@uniroma5.it.
Silvia MigliaccioDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Section of Medical Pathophysiology, Food Science and Endocrinology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, 00161, Italy. silvia.migliaccio@uniroma1.it.
Andrea G LaniaEndocrinology, Diabetology and Medical Andrology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Gianluca AimarettiDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, City of Health and Science University Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Roberto BaldelliEndocrinology Unit, Department of Oncology and Medical Specialties, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity affects a substantial proportion of patients receiving cancer treatment and shapes prognosis, treatment tolerance, and survivorship outcomes. The longstanding reliance on body mass index has shaped a weight-centric paradigm that misses the metabolic and functional phenotypes behind clinical risk, and too often delivers care driven by weight stigma rather than by physiology.

objectivesThis framework paper reconsiders the management of obesity in patients affected by cancer along three interconnected lines: assessment beyond BMI, stigma-free communication, and integrated, phase-sensitive care along the cancer continuum. Key content. Body composition phenotyping, including the recognition of sarcopenic obesity, ectopic fat deposition, and myosteatosis, is now within reach through opportunistic radiomics on staging computed tomography, and yields prognostic information that BMI alone cannot deliver. International consensus statements increasingly frame obesity as a chronic, complex, and relapsing disease rather than a matter of individual responsibility, and emphasize that person-first language and the active reduction of weight bias should be embedded as core components of cancer care. The therapeutic armamentarium spans nutritional strategies grounded in ESPEN principles, structured exercise with resistance training at its core, behavioural and psychological support, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and metabolic-bariatric surgery, the latter linked to substantial reductions in cancer incidence and mortality. Goals shift along the continuum: lean mass optimisation in prehabilitation, lean mass preservation during active treatment, fat mass reduction in follow-up, and cachexia prevention in palliative phases.

conclusionsA phase-sensitive, multidisciplinary, stigma-free framework moves obesity care away from a weight-centric paradigm and toward optimisation of body composition and metabolic health throughout the cancer trajectory.

Indexed as

Cancer managementLifestyle modificationNutritionObesity stigmaPhysical exercise

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.