Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42611794›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

A Multidisciplinary Team-Based Large Language Model Framework for Predicting Postoperative Neurological Complications in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Model Development and Validation Study.

Jili Li, Julin Zhang, Xingrui Tao, Yaoye Chen, Siqi Xun, Guangshuo Qin, Kaiyue Diao, Chaoyi Qin

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jili Li *Department of Thoracic Surgery and Institute of Thoracic Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7051-0503
Julin Zhang *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Cardiovascular Surgery Research Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China, 86 028 85422897.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4542-9941
Xingrui TaoWest China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3792-2359
Yaoye ChenWest China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3711-310X
Siqi XunDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery and Cardiovascular Surgery Research Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China, 86 028 85422897.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8198-8175
Guangshuo QinSchool of Computer Science, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-3772-2006
Kaiyue DiaoDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6497-1020
Chaoyi QinDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery and Cardiovascular Surgery Research Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China, 86 028 85422897.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7340-0628

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative neurological complications (PNCs) after acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) surgery are clinically emergent and require multidimensional perioperative risk assessment. Large language models (LLMs) have shown potential in clinical prediction, but the incremental value of structured multiagent collaboration remains unclear. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a multidisciplinary team (MDT)-based LLM framework for predicting PNC after ATAAD surgery and to compare its performance with that of traditional machine learning (ML) models and single-agent LLM settings. Methods: A retrospective cohort from January 2020 to June 2024 (N=763) was randomly divided into a training set (n=533) and an internal validation set (n=230). A prospective cohort from July 2024 to June 2025 (n=120) was used for prospective validation. The outcome was PNC, defined as stroke, cerebral hemorrhage, paraplegia, or coma. Population-level in-context learning used outcome-stratified summary statistics from the training cohort, including predictor distributions in patients with and without PNC and between-group Results: PNC occurred in 13.0% (99/763) of patients in the retrospective cohort and 15.8% (19/120) in the prospective cohort. Among the ML models, the random forest achieved the highest AUC in the internal validation set (AUC 0.7857, 95% CI 0.6945-0.8768). Among the LLM configurations, GPT-5 with MDT and in-context learning achieved the highest AUC (AUC 0.8419, 95% CI 0.7398-0.9440), with a sensitivity of 80.00%, specificity of 87.00%, and Brier score of 0.0876. Although this configuration showed a significantly higher AUC than the fully unaided GPT-5 baseline ( Conclusions: The GPT-5 configuration combining MDT-style collaboration with population-level in-context learning showed promising discrimination for PNC prediction after ATAAD surgery. However, the MDT layer did not produce a statistically significant incremental improvement in AUC over the corresponding single-agent settings, and its predictive contribution remains to be confirmed. The framework generated structured, role-specific rationales, supporting its further evaluation as a proof-of-concept approach for postoperative risk stratification. Larger multicenter studies are required before routine clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Aortic DissectionNervous System DiseasesPatient Care TeamPostoperative ComplicationsDissection, Ascending AortaFemaleHumansLarge Language ModelsMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsProspective StudiesRetrospective Studiesacute type A aortic dissectionin-context learninglarge language modelmachine learningmultidisciplinary teampostoperative neurological complications

Identifiers

PMID42611794
PMCPMC13484818

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.