SynthesisThe Lancet. Public health2026
Domain-specific physical activity levels and risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The Lancet. Public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAssociations between physical activity and distinct health outcomes vary by domain (eg, leisure-time, occupational, household, or commuting); however, comparable evidence on dementia risk remains scarce. We aimed to examine the associations between domain-specific physical activity and risk of all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular dementia.
methodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we systematically searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science for cohort and case-control studies published between Jan 1, 2021, and May 2, 2026. We also included studies from a previous systematic review (from database inception to Oct 21, 2021) with the same search strategy and eligibility criteria. Eligible studies included adults aged 20 years or older with cognitive function assessed at baseline, physical activity measures, and at least 1 year of follow-up. Studies were appraised with the Rayyan web-based platform and summary data (relative risk [RR] and 95% CI) were extracted by up to six independent reviewers. Outcomes were all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and vascular dementia, analysed by multilevel random-effects meta-analyses. Study quality was assessed with an adapted scale. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251010899).
findingsAmong 6270 identified records, 17 studies were eligible for inclusion. Combined with 57 studies in the previous systematic review, we included 74 studies totalling 4 227 297 participants (2 230 046 [52·8%] female and 1 997 251 [47·2%] male; median age 67·3 years [IQR 56·5-74·1]). 40 (54%) studies were of moderate or high quality and 69 (93%) were conducted in high-income countries. Over a median follow-up of 10·0 years (IQR 5·1-21·3), high physical activity levels were associated with reduced risks of all-cause dementia (n=146 effect sizes; RR 0·80 [95% CI 0·75-0·86]; I
interpretationThe association between physical activity and dementia risk might be domain-specific. Public health strategies for the prevention of dementia should address equitable access to safe spaces for exercise, adequate leisure time, and mitigation strategies in occupational settings.
fundingUS National Institutes of Health, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul; the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development; and Department of Science and Technology of Secretariat of Science, Technology, Innovation and Health Complex of Ministry of Health of Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.