ArticleScientific reports2026
The effect of education provided to university students on sustainable nutrition: a comparison of ChatGPT and individual nutrition education.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of face-to-face, individually delivered sustainable nutrition education for university students with that of a ChatGPT-generated educational brochure. The Sustainable Eating Behavior Scale, the Sustainable Food Literacy Scale, and the Sustainable Food Choice Questionnaire were used. Face-to-face group education was provided, and the ChatGPT-generated data was distributed to students in the brochure group without modification. In generalized linear mixed model analyses, while the main effect of time was strong for all scales (p < 0.001), statistically significant results were obtained for the time × education type interaction in the Behaviors Scale Towards Sustainable Nutrition (β = -27.47, p < 0.001), the Sustainable Food Literacy Scale (β = -38.54, p < 0.001), and the Sustainable Food Choice Scale (β = -26.41, p < 0.001). Face-to-face education yielded greater improvements across all scales compared to a ChatGPT-generated educational brochure. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first in the literature to compare the effects of face-to-face and ChatGPT-generated educational brochure on sustainable nutrition. Although both types of education were effective, face-to-face nutrition education had a stronger effect than the ChatGPT-generated educational brochure. AI-powered tools may complement sustainable nutrition education; however, face-to-face education demonstrated stronger effects on the measured outcomes in the present study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.