ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026
Predictive fatigue-aware human-robot collaboration: a real-time, open-source ROS 2 instantiation of a three-module human-centric digital twin framework on a standard cobot.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Industry 5.0 cobotics calls for collaborative robots that adapt to the operator's physical and cognitive state in real time. Most current industrial deployments remain reactive, responding only after explicit commands and ignoring the operator's psychophysiological condition. The three-module Human-Centric Digital Twin (HCDT) framework establishes the upstream perception-and-reasoning architecture for such systems using Vision-Language Models, and identifies closed-loop feedback and physical-assistance mechanisms as the natural next layer in the framework's development. Building on that foundation, this paper presents a complementary, real-time instantiation specialised for the resource-constrained, vision-plus-biosignal setting typical of ergonomics-and-safety HRC, deployed on a standard collaborative robot (Universal Robots UR3 with a Robotiq 2F-85 gripper) and extended with closed-loop operator-state adaptation. The Perception module pairs MediaPipe hand-landmark tracking and a Random Forest gesture classifier with Tobii Pro Glasses 3 pupillometry. The Reasoning module combines a ten-state finite-state machine, a weighted composite fatigue score (blink rate, blink duration, PERCLOS, hand-jerk) banded into FRESH, MILD, MODERATE and SEVERE, a saccade-gated commitment fixation, and a Task-Evoked Pupillary Response (TEPR) detector for acute-stress soft-emergency-stop. The Motion module provides a closed-form analytical inverse-kinematics solver, workspace clamping and a slew-rate-limited joint-velocity controller. Velocity-based linear extrapolation of hand position over a 0.5 s horizon enables anticipatory robot pre-positioning. The system is presented as a single-operator feasibility study rather than a generalisation claim. On a leak-free split-then-augment evaluation (520 raw test samples not seen by the training fold in any orientation), the Random Forest classifier reaches 99.62% accuracy with both errors falling in the Okay-Neutral confusion pair that the geometric override layer is designed to catch; a comparison against MLP and KNN baselines on the same split shows all three classifiers within the real-time control budget. Saccade-gated early-commit is designed to recover the modelled 150-300 ms gaze-to-motion lead, and the TEPR Soft E-Stop operates on an independent 300-500 ms channel. End-to-end gesture-to-motion latency has a conservative worst-case ceiling of approximately 830 ms, formed by a camera-buffer term, the 10-frame debounce and one control tick, inside the 1-s interactive response-time limit adopted as the design target. Owing to a Tobii Pro Glasses 3 hardware fault, the physiological pathways (fatigue banding, TEPR soft-stop and gaze commitment) were verified through their downstream control responses to simulated triggers rather than validated on organic pupil data; organic, multi-participant validation is identified as future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.