ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Caregiving experiences and support challenges of older caregivers from the perspective of the digital divide: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to explore the caregiving experiences and support challenges faced by older caregivers when using digital health technologies. By examining these experiences through the lens of the digital divide, this research seeks to provide empirical evidence to support the development of inclusive and age-friendly digital health services. Methods: This study employed a qualitative descriptive design. Using purposive sampling, 16 older caregivers of hospitalized older patients were recruited from the cardiovascular department of a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou. Semi-structured interviews were conducted between July 6 and August 25, 2025, and data were analyzed using directed content analysis. Results: The experiences and dilemmas of older caregivers interacting with digital health technologies were categorized into three core themes and six sub-themes: (1) Access-level barriers (Mismatch between age-related decline and technology design; Lack of intergenerational support); (2) Operational challenges (Cognitive overload from limited digital literacy; Concerns regarding technology efficacy and safety); and (3) Gaps in perception and trust (Reliance on traditional caregiving methods; Insufficient professional guidance and help-seeking channels). Conclusion: This study shows that the digital divide faced by older caregivers extends beyond mere access or skills. It is also shaped by age-related decline, complex technology design, limited trust, and insufficient support. Cumulatively, these factors drive digital disability, compromising caregivers' ability to navigate digital health services effectively in real-world caregiving scenarios. Addressing these challenges requires age-friendly design, targeted digital literacy training, and a multi-sectoral support network involving families, communities, healthcare institutions, and policymakers. These efforts are essential to ensure equitable access to digital health services and foster healthy aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.