ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Beyond chronological age: a decision tree model integrating nutritional and renal function indicators for risk prediction in pre-frail older adults with hepatolithiasis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study develops a decision tree model to predict risks and identify key factors in pre-frail older adults hepatolithiasis patients and performance of models. Methods: The study included 451 pre-frail older adults. Two balanced sample groups totaling 294 cases were obtained via Propensity Score Matching (PSM). Risk prediction models for hepatolithiasis were constructed based on the full sample and the two groups via applying the Classification and Regression Tree algorithm. Models' performance was evaluated by 10-fold cross-validation, ROC, and AUC, and models' performance and key factors for hepatolithiasis risk were compared and analyzed. Results: A total of 451 pre-frail older adults were included. PSM (1:1 ratio) was conducted to reduce confounding factors, with 147 matched pairs. In the full-sample decision tree model, age (>66.85 years) was identified as the primary split node, followed sequentially by strongly positive urine protein, marital status (married, widowed), height, and educational level. The model achieved a classification accuracy of 72.4%, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.795 (95% CI: 0.744-0.845). Following PSM, two subgroup decision tree models were developed. The Group 1 model identified age (>66.45 years), body mass index (>21.40 kg/m Conclusion: Decision tree risk prediction models for hepatolithiasis were developed in pre-frail older adults. Age emerged as the dominant risk factor across all models, with additional predictors involving nutritional, metabolic, and renal function indicators. Propensity score-matched subgroup models demonstrated superior discriminative performance compared to the full-sample model. These findings indicate that decision tree modeling, especially when combined with PSM, provides an interpretable and effective approach for identifying high-risk individuals in this vulnerable population. Nevertheless, the potential for overfitting underscores the necessity of external validation using larger, independent cohorts to ensure model generalizability. Future efforts may integrate ensemble learning algorithms to enhance model stability and stratify populations based on advanced age combined with metabolic or hepatic dysfunction profiles, thereby enabling more targeted prevention and intervention strategies for hepatolithiasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.