Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614288›Full record

ReviewPublic health reviews2026

Vaccination in Islamic countries: a narrative review.

Antonia-Olivia Roberts, Shahid Jameel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Public health reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Antonia-Olivia RobertsUniversity of Oxford Green Templeton College, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Shahid JameelUniversity of Oxford Green Templeton College, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is a key public health intervention, and Muslims who comprise a quarter of the world's population, have shown mixed responses to it. Previous research has addressed Islamic perspectives on vaccination but understanding its efficacy from secular and religious points of view across Islamic countries is limited. This narrative review utilised database search (Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, SSRN, and Web of Science) followed by curation based on expert knowledge. It offers theological and technological insights, and the potential impacts of climate change on vaccination in Islamic countries. Though Islamic teachings support vaccination, hesitancy results from a complex mixture of sociological and technological barriers that include misinformation, lack of trust, poor living conditions, and vaccine inequity in resource-limited communities. Climate change will act as a threat multiplier, particularly in areas inhabited by over 80 percent of the world's Muslims. Successful approaches from Islamic countries highlight the role of cultural and religious perspectives, infrastructure, and biological factors on the coverage and efficacy of childhood, adolescent and adult vaccines. The learnings offer strategies to improve vaccination everywhere, but particularly in Muslim populations.

Indexed as

climate changeIslamic countriesvaccine accessvaccine hesitancyvaccines

Identifiers

PMID42614288
PMCPMC13481328

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.