ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Digital health solutions for chronic disease physical activity management: wearable devices, artificial intelligence, and public health implementation.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physical inactivity and sedentary behavior are major modifiable risk factors in chronic disease management, yet conventional clinic-based follow-up is poorly suited to capture real-world behavioral dynamics or deliver timely personalized support. Wearable devices provide longitudinal data on steps, activity intensity, sedentary time, sleep, heart rate, and selected physiological signals, while artificial intelligence (AI) may support feedback personalization, risk prediction, dynamic goal setting, and remote coordination. This review synthesizes evidence on wearable- and AI-supported physical activity management across diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, cancer survivorship, and older-adult multimorbidity. Current evidence most consistently supports improvements in behavioral outcomes, including steps, physical activity levels, self-monitoring, and in some cases sedentary behavior. Evidence for functional and intermediate clinical outcomes is promising but heterogeneous, while evidence for long-term clinical endpoints, cost-effectiveness, and health-system integration remains less definitive. AI-specific evidence remains comparatively early, heterogeneous, and often feasibility-oriented, so claims about AI-enabled benefit require cautious interpretation. The review argues that wearable devices and AI should not replace clinical care, but should be understood as components of digital public health closed loops that connect continuous sensing, personalized behavioral support, clinical actionability, governance, and equity. Future research should move beyond isolated devices or apps toward validating explainable, actionable, equitable, and sustainable digital intervention pathways in real chronic disease populations and health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.