Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42614756›Full record

ArticleAI in neuroscience2026

PIGSKIN: PIG SKull stripping with synthetic Images and Neural networks.

Javid Dadashkarimi, Drew Parker, Nima Broomand Lomer, Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, Douglas H Smith, Victoria Johnson, John Wolf, Ragini Verma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AI in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Javid DadashkarimiDiffusion and Connectomics in Precision Healthcare Research Lab (DiCIPHR), Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania.
Drew ParkerDiffusion and Connectomics in Precision Healthcare Research Lab (DiCIPHR), Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania.
Nima Broomand LomerDiffusion and Connectomics in Precision Healthcare Research Lab (DiCIPHR), Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania.
Ramon Diaz-ArrastiaPenn Center for Brain Injury and Repair, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Douglas H SmithPenn Center for Brain Injury and Repair, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Victoria JohnsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
John WolfPenn Center for Brain Injury and Repair, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Ragini VermaDiffusion and Connectomics in Precision Healthcare Research Lab (DiCIPHR), Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania.

Funding

dMRI-guided pre-operative planning for supra-total resection of high-gradegliomasR01CA278819 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Michele Renee Aizenberg, Constantinos George Hadjipanayis · 2023 to 2026
$3.2M
Developing Gyrencephalic Models of TBI-Induced ADRD NeuropathologyRF1NS138030 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JOHNSON, VICTORIA ELEANOR · 2024 to 2024
$3.1M
Mechanisms of Chronic Progressive Axon Degeneration Following TBIR01NS123034 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Daniel Kacy Cullen, Douglas Hamilton Smith · 2022 to 2026
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA278819NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123034NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS138030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robust brain extraction is an essential first step for quantitative neuroimaging, yet no reliable method exists for porcine MRI despite its importance as a translational neuroscientific animal model, particularly gyrencephalic traumatic brain injury (TBI). Porcine anatomy presents unique challenges, with extensive extracranial fat and complex textures around the olfactory bulbs that confound existing human-based tools. We present PIGSKIN, a deep learning framework trained entirely on synthetic data generated from a small set of expert annotations. Unlike conventional approaches, PIGSKIN models brain and non-brain regions separately, applying distinct clustering and transformation parameters to each. This strategy constrains variability in brain anatomy while allowing greater diversity in extracranial tissues, ensuring anatomically consistent label maps in which the brain remains embedded within its surroundings. Additional transformations introduce further spatial and intensity variability, producing a rich stream of synthetic training pairs. During inference, PIGSKIN operates in a single step at native resolution within a standardized cube, preserving fine-scale anatomical detail and enabling generalization across cohorts differing in breed, acquisition protocol, and injury model. The model achieved comparable to expert consistency accuracy (Dice ≈ 0.97), approaching the range of reported inter-rater reliability. Finally, we show that incorporating co-registered T1- and T2-weighted inputs significantly outperforms single-modality training, underscoring the value of multimodal integration for synthetic data generation. Together, these results establish PIGSKIN as the first systematically validated solution for porcine brain extraction and a framework adaptable to other large animal brain extraction tasks.

Identifiers

PMID42614756
PMCPMC13484249

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.