ReviewACS pharmacology & translational science2026
Quantum-Augmented Federated AI for Adaptive Pharmacogenomic Precision Oncology: A Perspective.
Review in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precision oncology has evolved from single-gene biomarker testing toward multimodal molecular and clinical profiling; however, most therapeutic decisions remain based on static baseline assessments that inadequately capture tumor evolution, treatment response, and emerging resistance. In this perspective, we propose a forward-looking framework that integrates federated learning, pharmacogenomic digital twins, and hybrid quantum-classical optimization to support the development of adaptive, privacy-preserving precision oncology systems. The framework enables collaborative model training across institutions without sharing raw patient data, thereby addressing major barriers associated with data fragmentation and privacy regulations. Patient-specific digital twins serve as continuously evolving computational representations that integrate longitudinal multiomics, imaging, pathology, and clinical information to simulate disease trajectories, estimate therapeutic response, and anticipate resistance patterns. Federated learning allows these models to benefit from geographically distributed patient cohorts while maintaining data sovereignty and institutional privacy. In contrast to near-term deployable components such as federated learning and digital twin modeling, quantum computing is presented as a future-oriented computational strategy that may assist selected combinatorial optimization tasks, including treatment selection, dose optimization, and scheduling, through hybrid quantum-classical workflows. Rather than assuming immediate clinical utility or quantum advantage, the framework emphasizes realistic translational pathways that acknowledge current limitations in quantum hardware, scalability, validation, and regulatory readiness. We further discuss technical feasibility, challenges associated with heterogeneous clinical data, privacy considerations, validation requirements, and regulatory pathways for adaptive AI-enabled clinical decision-support systems. By providing a formal conceptual architecture and translational roadmap, this perspective outlines how federated artificial intelligence, continuously learning digital twins, and future quantum-assisted optimization may collectively contribute to the next generation of adaptive precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.